The world is struggling to protect its most crucial natural areas. Poorer countries are faring the worst, but even a wealthy nation like Australia isn't doing very well.
In total, 156 sites on the World Heritage List are recognized for their outstanding biodiversity values -- they protect parts of 31 of the world's 35 biodiversity hotspots, and a portion of all of its high-biodiversity wilderness areas.
But the first World Heritage Outlook Report -- released last week at the World Parks Congress in Sydney, Australia -- found that many of these sites are struggling. Nearly a tenth (8%) are in critical condition, and nearly a third (29%) of 'significant concern'.
Unfortunately for global biodiversity, many of the critical sites are tropical forests. These include Virunga National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo -- home to the iconic mountain gorilla -- and the Tropical Rainforests Heritage of Sumatra, Indonesia, the last place on Earth where orangutans, tigers, elephants, and rhinos still coexist.
Also in critical condition is Salonga National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo, a key refuge for bonobos, the smaller and remarkably placid cousins of chimpanzees.
Developing nations face many governance, economic, and social disadvantages that are creating profound challenges for nature conservation.
But even in wealthy, stable Australia, the picture is not good. For example, the World Heritage Committee has repeatedly threatened to declare the Great Barrier Reef a World Heritage Site in Danger.
And the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area is in the 'significant concern' category. The site -- renowned for its unique biodiversity and cultural values -- faces a battery of threats, including its extreme vulnerability to climate change, scores of invasive species, growing threats from infrastructure and urbanization, and other perils.
Remarkably, research published last year in the leading journal Science rated the Queensland Wet Tropics the second most irreplaceable World Heritage site globally for its outstanding biodiversity values.
Notably, World Heritage magazine recently identified the Queensland Wet Tropics site as one of six 'Best Practice' examples globally. So why is the site now perceived to be in so much danger?
In short, politics. Both the federal government in Australia and the state government of Queensland are not considered conservation-friendly. As a result, the Wet Tropics Management Authority, which is responsible for managing and protecting the Queensland rainforests, has been paralyzed.
The board currently has no budget, and only two of its six required non-Executive Board Members. The federal and Queensland governments have decided not to make any new Board appointments until a Queensland government “review” of World Heritage management.
The news gets worse. The federal government is now proposing to greatly weaken environmental impact assessments in Queensland. One shudders to think about the potential implications.
If the Australian and Queensland governments continue down this path, one of the world's most important natural areas could face even greater perils.
It’s time for the Australian and international communities to demand action from Australia's political leaders. It's simply shameful to play political football with a site of such outstanding natural and cultural values -- a site that increasingly appears to be in imminent danger.