ALERT member Jean-Philippe Puyravaud tells us about worrying developments in his Indian homeland:
A recent news article in Nature reports that Indian ecologists are alarmed about the newly elected government approving big development projects without adequate environmental impact assessments (EIAs).
They have good reasons to be afraid.
In India and many other democracies today, environmental laws are considered by politicians to be a hurdle to development.
Environmental laws are labeled red-tape, EIAs are deemed arbitrary, and environmentalists are slagged off as biased activists who act against the greater interest of the nation.
But is this really the case?
In a corrupt society like India's, red-tape is really a euphemism for 'bargain'. Favors are purchased from the government -- which then turns a blind eye to a project's real environmental impacts.
Are EIAs 'arbitrary'? Most are not. They are merely not up to an acceptable standard -- and the legal framework in any case is largely inadequate.
Environmentalists are delaying the nation's development? Hardly.
In reality, many problems are delaying national progress by reducing India's GDP, such as the inordinate number of traffic deaths on Indian roads, pollution, life-style-related epidemics, and widespread nepotism.
In short, protecting biodiversity never sank a nation.
Can the newly elected government of India reduce red tape and economic hurdles while safeguarding its unique biological heritage?
The signs are not promising. With an avalanche of new development projects likely to be approved very quickly, the challenges for Indian biodiversity are likely to come hard and fast.