One of the more heated controversies in conservation science concerns genetically modified crops. Are GM crops a boon for conservation or a serious danger?
On the one hard are those who believe GM crops are vital to increase agricultural production (and in some cases to reduce pesticide use), thereby allowing us produce more food on less land and spare more land for nature conservation. The followers of this view often see the anti-GM crowd as hopelessly misguided or naive.
On the other hand are those who see potential dangers in GM crops -- ones that might outweigh their benefits in some if not many cases. The term "Frankenfoods" has sometimes been applied to GM crops, reflecting the fear that these genetically modified foods might have a darker side.
ALERT member Jean-Philippe Puyravaud from India counts himself among those who worry about GM crops. Here he tells us about his fears about one crop in particular.
A genetically modified crop is produced by introducing genes from another species, and the Bt. brinjal (a type of modified eggplant) was developing by introducing genes from a bacterium (Bacillus thuringensis) that is resistant to borers and caterpillars.
However, GM organisms pose potential risks such as creating more vigorous pests, and could harm non-target species and disrupt biotic communities.
A recent study concludes that hybridization is possible between wild and cultivated brinjal in southern India, and another study showed there is a clear potential for transgenes to spread to wild brinjal populations.
Hence, the risk of transgene escape to wild or domesticated plants cannot be ignored. Before introducing a GM crop, it is vital to check whether its genes can be transferred to wild relatives via pollinators.
Yes, we need to feed a hungry world. But GM crops are not a panacea. We have to study each one, on a case-by-case basis, before deciding whether or not its benefits will outweigh its risks.