Habitat fragmentation is having "terrifying" effects on ecosystems

A global surge in habitat fragmentation is simply "terrifying", according to two dozen of the world's top ecologists. 

A forest elephant... not many places to hide anymore.

A forest elephant... not many places to hide anymore.

The authors make this assertion in a paper (which you can download free here) in the leading journal Science Express
 
The paper was led by Nick Haddad from North Carolina State University, and includes ALERT members Thomas Lovejoy and Bill Laurance as coauthors.

The study contrasts all of the major experimental studies of habitat fragmentation that have ever been conducted -- including the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project in central Amazonia, which was founded by Lovejoy in 1979 and is the largest and longest-running of all the experiments.

The study concludes that, almost inevitably, fragmentation has a severe effect on species diversity and ecological functioning -- in ecosystems ranging from rainforests to woodlands to isolated patches of moss.

One of the key drivers of change in ecosystems is edge effects -- physical and biological changes associated with the abrupt, artificial edges of habitat fragments.  For instance, you often see more tree mortality, fires, microclimatic stresses, and invasive species near edges.

The study concluded that 70 percent of all the world’s forests are now within one kilometer of a forest edge, and 20 percent is within a football field of an edge.
 
“There’s really only two big blocks of forest surviving on Earth today,” said Professor Haddad.  “That’s the Amazon and Africa’s Congo Basin.”
 
And even those great forests are under assault.  For example, loggers have bulldozed more than 50,000 kilometers of new roads into the Congo since the year 2000.  As a result, the forests have been invaded by poachers with modern weapons, who have killed off two-thirds of the world’s forest elephants for their valuable ivory tusks.
 
The study was highlighted in an excellent article in the famous New Yorker magazine.  It underscores that fact that roads really are the biggest danger.

Once a road cuts into a forest, we often see an influx of illegal colonists, loggers, poachers and miners, especially in developing nations where the rule of law is often limited.
 
In the Amazon, for instance, 95 percent of all deforestation occurs within five kilometers of a road

The take-home message is obvious: If we’re going to preserve parts of wild nature for future generations, we simply must keep the roads out.
 

ALERT's latest campaign: 'Sustainable' corporation blasted for destroying Amazon rainforest

A corporation that aims to be the world’s biggest supplier of ‘sustainable’ cacao -- the main ingredient in chocolate -- is being accused by ALERT scientists of destroying large expanses of biodiversity-rich forest in Peru.  ALERT issued this press release today.

Rainforest destruction in the Peruvian Amazon...

Rainforest destruction in the Peruvian Amazon...

The Company, United Cacao, previously raised 10 million pounds on the London Stock Exchange, and is now hoping to raise additional funds on the Lima Stock Exchange in Peru to expand its operations in the Peruvian Amazon. 

ALERT scientists caution investors that United Cacao’s products may be far from environmentally sustainable, and that they should exercise exceptional caution before investing in the company or its Peruvian subsidiary, Cacao del Peru Norte.

“This company has its roots in Southeast Asia’s palm oil industry, which has been a huge driver of forest destruction,” said ALERT director William Laurance.  Laurance has conducted research in the Amazon region for nearly 20 years.

“World-class scientists at the Carnegie Institution at Stanford University and the Amazon Conservation Association have used satellite data and cutting-edge laser technology to show that United Cacao has recently cleared more than 2,000 hectares of mostly old-growth rainforest in Peru,” said ALERT member Thomas Lovejoy, a long-term Amazon expert and former environmental advisor to three U.S. presidents.

A small fraction of the cleared land evidently was farmed in the past, and parts of the forest were likely selectively logged in the 1980s, according to a detailed report in the leading environmental website Mongabay.com, based on thorough investigative research by John C. Cannon.

However, the laser technology -- known as LIDAR -- has shown that the carbon stocks contained in the destroyed forests were among the highest known for the Peruvian Amazon, according to Carnegie researcher Greg Asner.  This clearly indicates that the cleared block was formerly dominated by mature or old-growth rainforest.

“There’s no way you can clear old-growth rainforest and then claim to produce sustainable cacao,” said Lovejoy. 

“Not only that,” said Lovejoy, “but the corporation did so very quietly and without conducting an environmental impact study.  That sets a very dangerous precedent.”

“We see a lot of green-washing among corporations today -- where firms try to appear sustainable but really aren’t,” said ALERT member Lian Pin Koh, an associate professor at the University of Adelaide in Australia. 

“My fear, based on these recent findings of large-scale forest destruction, is that United Cacao is one of these green-washing corporations,” said Koh. 

“The forests of the Peruvian Amazon are just about the biologically richest real estate on the planet,” said Laurance.  “And unfortunately there’s a feeding frenzy happening, with large-scale expansion of oil palm and cacao plantations, as well as a great deal of legal and illegal mining and logging.”

“Investors need to be sure that they’re putting their money into projects and corporations that are truly sustainable,” said Laurance.  “Right now we have a lot of doubts about United Cacao.”